
“I don’t say that radio networks must die… Every effort is being made and will continue to be made to find new patterns, new selling arrangements and new types of programs that may arrest declining revenues. It may yet be possible to eke out a poor existence for radio networks, but I don’t know.” (David Sarnoff, president of RCA, c. 1950)
A lot of my friends in the media — and by this I mean the press, a more traditional definition of “media”, and specifically newspaper and magazine reporters — have been engaging in very vocal fear-mongering lately regarding the future their livelihood. They’re feeling the sting of downsizing and closure and I don’t blame them for being scared. They feel threatened and so they’re asking questions rooted in fear, in a resistance to change, in a blind panic that exacerbates itself in a vicious cycle. What will happen to media in light of the raging, rampaging Internet? Where will our jobs go? What about the art of our work, the tradition of The Fourth Estate?
Now, Mr. Sarnoff of RCA had a pretty sweet position, no doubt laden with much stress but also quite a big paycheck. So the fact that he wasn’t worried about his own mortgage may have contributed to the rather cavalier attitude of his quote above. The truth is he didn’t have a clue about what was going to happen to radio in the advent of television; he probably didn’t feel very confident about whether TV would last another 10 years, either. It was totally new and crazy and nobody had a clue about its capacity or how big of an audience there was for it or that audience’s appetite for this thing.
But I like that attitude. I think it’s the right one to have. And it’s what entrepreneurs — particularly those involved, whether they like it or not, in a wave of evolution sweeping them into unknown territory — must have or else they need to find a new profession. It’s what helped Sarnoff maneuver from radio into television and it’s what going to help news reporters adapt from print to online. It’s also helping innovators in business and the arts — my clients — pave new avenues of income for themselves and there’s no reason at all why journalists can’t take this mindset and apply it to their own work or for the journalistic values they try to uphold to disappear simply because their writing doesn’t get produced on paper.
Pioneering media theorist Marshall McLuhan (patron saint of Wired magazine and revered by generations of mass communications professors, students and entities) is most known for his simple yet loaded statement, “The medium is the message.” During the early 1960’s, he also said the following: “If the audience can become involved in the actual process of making [it], then it’s happy. It’s like the old quiz shows — they were great TV because they gave the audience a role, something to do.”
Wired knew way back when they launched in ’93 that McLuhan got it. What I mean by that is that he didn’t just get what was relevant and in existence during his lifetime, he got the fact that “it” has and always will change, particularly in terms of the technological advancement of a medium, whether radio or television or computers or the Internet. He also felt confident that there would always be an audience and that this audience would always be seeking information.
I wish my comrades in journalism could get this, too. I wish they wouldn’t let fear of the unknown and uncertainty about the future dim their brilliance and innovation. Granted, some of them will not survive the transition of newsprint to .com; not everything is for everyone. But they need to see — and capitalize on, whether as a creator or an audience member — is that there is tremendous opportunity out there because the Internet is making it more feasible than ever for anyone to find something that not just appeals to but also actually benefits them. Exploiting this kind of individuality now is what will keep these reporters from dying off later.
The medium is changing. The message that the press needs to get out of this is that their skills can and should adapt to this change. Audiences will always need news, will always desire information. So let’s give it to them in the best way possible by going with the flow.
“Competition brings out the best in products and the worst in people” (Sarnoff)
I don’t want to see my friends at their worst, paralyzed by fear of products like Twitter and Facebook and whatever’s to come. Embrace what’s out there — there’s plenty of room for your talents. Contribute to the newness and you’re likely to discover that there’s a way you never thought of for those talents to be monetized, thus saving you from starvation or the need to find a new trade. The time of new media is about opportunity, not desperation.
C’mon, journalism — the Internet is giving you a role, something to do. Don’t cower. Rise to it.